What we do
01  Advanced Infrastructure 02  Applied AI & Data 03  AI Cybersecurity 04  AI Assurance
Engagements
Assurance review AI estate inventory Model evaluation & red team Human risk & impersonation defense API discovery & governance Cloud security posture assessment Infrastructure design review Managed detection & response Cybersecurity maturity & risk assessment OT & industrial cybersecurity assessment
Industries
Financial Services Government & Public Sector Energy & Utilities Telecommunications Healthcare & Life Sciences Transport & Logistics Industrial & Manufacturing Retail, Hospitality & Real Estate
Research
The Trust Maturity Model Readiness self-assessment Case studies Perspectives Sector briefings Technology evaluations
Company
About us Partners Events Careers Contact العربية Talk to our team

We engineer trust.
Then we prove it.

The systems you run have to be right. We start by proving whether they are, then build, secure and hold the ground underneath.

Orvix delivers AI assurance, cybersecurity, applied AI and infrastructure for banks, governments and enterprises across the GCC, wider MENA and the United States.

Everything in your estate (every system, model and interface you run) is either accounted for, or it isn’t. We solve for X.

Orvix does two things.

We establish trust boundaries. We solve for X.

All of technology is either an X or an O.

O: your circle of trust

Owned. Observed. Evidenced. Something inside the circle has a name against it, a signal you can watch, and a record that still stands up when someone asks.

X: the variable

Untapped technology. Unmeasured risk. A variable, not a constant. It changes value every time the estate does.

Where does X live?
The chain

How we build your circle.

Four links, each one moving a different kind of X inside the boundary. Each is only as credible as the one beneath it, and the fourth closes back to the first.

01

Advanced Infrastructure

Trust the ground it runs on
  • Map every circuit, cloud interconnect and data store that exists
  • Provision connectivity as a service instead of static circuits
  • Enforce residency where the data actually lands
  • Design storage that survives a site, a region, or a bad day
04

AI Assurance

Prove all of it to someone else
  • Build the register: every model, its owner, its data lineage
  • Test against ISO/IEC 42001 and the NIST AI Risk Management Framework
  • Red-team AI applications for leakage, prompt abuse and agent misuse
  • Produce an evidence pack a board or a regulator can actually read
01 02 03 04 Your circle of trust owned · observed · evidenced
02

Applied AI & Data

Trust what it decides
  • Classify and assign ownership of the data any model can reach
  • Route every model call through one governed path, and log it
  • Deploy agents with narrow write access and a human gate at each one
  • Put AI on the processes that carry real cost
03

AI Cybersecurity

Trust it under pressure
  • Monitor 24/7 with analysts who learn your environment
  • Test the approval steps that still trust a voice, a face or a signature
  • Verify liveness and content authenticity where money moves
  • Extend the same discipline into OT and critical infrastructure

Assurance closes the circle. Proof of the estate is what justifies the next investment in it.

Most organizations start with us at 04, because it is the link they are being asked about. What we find there usually explains why 01 through 03 matter.

The stakes

Some boards are solved. Yours is not.

Sooner or later, someone asks you to prove it
Show me the evidence this control was working on the day it mattered.the auditor
Who approved this, and what did they see before they approved it?the board
Which third parties can reach production, and when did you last verify?procurement
If this decision is challenged, what exactly do you hand over?counsel
What changed last quarter, and who signed it off?the regulator
Your move. You are X.

This game is solved. Your estate keeps moving.

This board is solved: every position has a known move and a known counter, all of it written down decades ago. Play perfectly and the best result is a draw.

Technology is not that simple. When someone asks you to prove your estate is sound, there is no solved position to look up. There is only what was written down, and what was left undone.

The distance between those two is where uncomfortable meetings happen. It is rarely a failure of competence. It is what scale does to visibility.

You can’t freeze your estate. You can always be ready to answer for it.

What we do

Defined engagements with a deliverable at the end.

Weeks, not quarters. Scoped work with a stated duration and a written output, so you know what you are buying before you buy it and a decision does not wait on a procurement cycle.

01

Assurance Review most common starting point

Independent assessment of the controls around your AI systems against ISO/IEC 42001, the NIST AI Risk Management Framework and the local requirements that apply. Each obligation is marked held, partial or absent.

Deliverable: evidence ledger & examiner-ready pack · 6 weeks
02

AI Estate Inventory

Find every AI system in use, including features built into purchased software, and record who owns it, what data it touches and whether it decides or only drafts.

Deliverable: AI system register · 3–5 weeks
03

Model Evaluation & Red Team

Adversarial testing of an AI application for prompt injection, data leakage and agent misuse, paired with evaluation against its stated purpose. It runs in a controlled test environment, or in production under limits agreed in writing.

Deliverable: findings, remediation guidance & retest · 4–6 weeks
04

Human Risk & Impersonation Defense

A review of the approval steps that rely on recognizing a person: payment release, vendor bank-detail changes, executive requests, onboarding and helpdesk resets. Each is tested under controlled deepfake and impersonation conditions.

Deliverable: process map, gap analysis & supervisor-ready pack · 4 weeks
05

API Discovery & Governance

Every interface actually running is found, classified by data sensitivity, assessed against the OWASP API Security Top 10 and given an owner and a lifecycle.

Deliverable: API inventory & governance model · 4–6 weeks
06

Cloud Security Posture Assessment

Azure, AWS, Microsoft 365 or your primary cloud, assessed across identity, configuration, exposure, data protection, logging and resilience. Zero Trust gaps named, remediation ranked.

Deliverable: posture findings & prioritized remediation roadmap · duration set at scoping
07

Infrastructure Design Review

A proposed or existing architecture tested for data residency, resilience, AI-readiness and cryptographic posture at every layer, before the design is committed.

Deliverable: target-state options & migration sequence · 4–6 weeks
08

Managed Detection & Response

24/7 monitoring, investigation and agreed containment, run on an in-region or a global track chosen per workload. What analysts may do in your environment is agreed in writing before go-live.

Operated service · 12-month term · 30 to 45 days onboarding
09

Cybersecurity Maturity & Risk Assessment

The broad entry point: your security program measured against NIST CSF 2.0, C2M2 and the CIS Controls, mapped to the regional requirements that apply, and scored so progress can be shown rather than asserted.

Deliverable: maturity baseline, risk register & roadmap · duration set at scoping
10

OT & Industrial Cybersecurity Assessment

For oil and gas, energy, manufacturing and critical infrastructure: asset visibility, IT/OT segmentation, remote and privileged access, legacy exposure and incident readiness, assessed against IEC 62443.

Deliverable: OT exposure findings & IEC 62443 gap assessment · duration set at scoping
Independent AI & Technology Assurance

Advisory firms tell you what good looks like. Vendors tell you what to buy.

Very few organizations will do both, and fewer still will stay long enough to build it. That gap is where we work.

The advisory firm

Board-level judgment

Deep relationships with audit, risk and the board. Real authority on what a defensible program looks like, and the standing to say so in the room.

The trade: cost, pace, and limited hands-on technology depth once the report is delivered.

Orvix

Both, from the same team

We assess, design and implement, with the same people and one evidence standard from the first engagement through to the running estate. When a system we built needs an assurance opinion, an independent party gives it, so the opinion stays credible.

No product of our own to defend.

The technology vendor

Depth in their own product

Real engineering, real capability, and people who know one platform better than anyone else in the market can.

The trade: the assessment and the product come from the same place.

We have no product to defend.

We do not sell a platform of our own, so nothing rides on which technology you choose. When we tell you something fits, the only thing behind that is the reasoning. That is why we show it to you.

It matters more than it used to. New categories appear, get funded, and either mature or disappear inside eighteen months. No enterprise team can evaluate that flow and run an estate at the same time. The vendor landscape is itself a variable.

01

We evaluate continuously

Tracking emerging categories is standing work for us. By the time a requirement reaches you, the shortlist already exists.

02

We prove it before you commit

Technical proof-of-concept against your actual constraints (residency, latency, existing estate, operating model) before anyone signs anything.

03

We show the reasoning

You get the short list with the trade-offs attached, including when the best answer is to keep what you already run.

Working with what you already run

Most of our engagements begin inside an established estate with significant prior investment. Continuity with the platforms you already operate is a design constraint we work to. We build on what is working and replace only what the evidence says must go.

How we operate

Regional market presence. Global engineering. Vendor-backed delivery.

Three commitments behind every engagement, from the first scoping call to the system in operation.

Regional market presence

Named account ownership across the GCC, wider MENA and the United States. One accountable relationship from start to finish.

We work to the standards our clients are measured against: UAE Information Assurance Standard, DESC ISR, SAMA Cyber Security Framework, NCA ECC, and the CBUAE guidance that applies to regulated financial institutions.

Global engineering

Our engineering capability is distributed across regions, with senior engineers on every engagement. That is what allows a scoped assessment at a price a large consultancy cannot match.

Vendor-backed delivery

Implementation is executed with named technology partners and, where a jurisdiction requires it, through licensed local providers, so the work happens inside the local framework rather than around it.

Our standard

Evidence over claims.

Where our work maps to a framework, we show the mapping control by control, so your auditors and your regulator can verify it themselves. Where a jurisdiction requires a licensed local provider, we deliver through one, inside the local framework. Every engagement is built to stand up in due diligence.

Perspectives newsletter

Hear about new research when it lands.

Occasional emails, only when something is published. One address, unsubscribe in one click.

Start here

Start with the evidence.

A fixed-scope assurance review of your AI estate: inventory, control mapping against the frameworks that apply to you, and a written evidence package your board and your regulator can read. Fixed fee, six weeks, no obligation beyond it.

The people who bring us in are usually the ones who saw it coming.